Yamaha cd-rw driver

And due to the incorrect operation of this mode on one of the recorders the results turned to be so much contrast. The result is much better than claimed in the specs and a bit higher than that of the Plextor.

The other drive CRWE takes the lead in this test. Record of the CD-R Noname 4x. But comparing the received figures it will reveal the difference in only 9 seconds, what does not matter as compared with half an hour taken for the full formatting.

CD-RW Ricoh 10x. And formatting of the Ricoh disc for further 10x recording was more difficult for the Yamaha. The difference in some tests were more than 2 minutes. In addition to the basic testing we recorded the Mirex Gold's at the speed higher than established in the specification. It is explained, first, by the fact that at the time of testing the local market still had nothing to offer from CD-Rs which allowing writing at up to 16X it was not so long time ago when CD-R discs from Verbatim and Philips MultiPurpose appeared on the market.

Secondly, we wanted to find out whether the recording results are comparable with CD-R recorded at high speeds, produced by different methods, with usage of different active layer. We just wanted get a conception how great is the potential of the technology of cyanine disc production and how great are the possibilities of enabling the resources that would allow recording the discs, based on this technology, at the speeds higher than 12X.

Look at the figures - they will tell you everything. Just note that the scores of the both devices are similar. While testing the "BLERmeter" registered frequent marked leaps, what resulted in such an average value with high uncertainty. On receiving the results we were unpleasantly surprised with them, that's why we decided on sending the tested samples Philips and Noname in order to test them with the CDCATS SA3 station.

The CD-R Mirex weren't in this list since we examined them a bit later but on the same drives. For read graphs of other drives see the first four and the sixth part of the review. As we already mention the both drives were tight close in record quality, but they read discs differently. And as to the Teac CDE, it read discs almost equally.

In most cases the test was stopped with an error, and the graph looked like this:. The green line is a reading speed left scale , the yellow one is a disc rotation speed, thousand rpm right scale. Unbelievable - two drives that were supposed to be the twins "gladdened" us with completely different scores.

Unfortunately, it's one of the few of its advantages. Like in the CDSpeed test, one of the recorders shows higher reading speed but less stable graphs than the second model. The results of testing in speed and correctness of extraction from the audio CD are successful.

For many drives, we tested, the disc Acoustic Planet vol. Direct copying from recorded CDs to the hard drive This test is aimed to obtain more proper information, do not take it as the serious torture for the drive.

Since the disc structure is nonuniform and compound, the results were quite low even for 40x devices. The amplitude is small but the high frequency of them confuses me.

The second recorder read the "golden" disc at lower speed and with less difficulty. The "scratched" one was read by the both drives equally good. Although the reading speed was in the range 8XX, the graph fell only where it should do. Conclusion Undoubtedly, a release of the 16x model of a CD-RW is some kind a break-through in the industry of computer optical data storing and recording systems, but I think that a purchase of such model today would be unjustified step.

I suppose that the main requirement to the CD-RW drive is a quality and possibly quick recording. This Agreement shall be interpreted according to and governed by Japanese law without reference to principles of conflict of laws. Any dispute or procedure shall be heard before the Tokyo District Court in Japan. If for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction finds any portion of this Agreement to be unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to use of the SOFTWARE and any accompanying written materials and supersedes all prior or contemporaneous understandings or agreements, written or oral, regarding the subject matter of this Agreement.

No amendment or revision of this Agreement will be binding unless in writing and signed by a fully authorized representative of Yamaha. Note that the system requirements may be slightly different from those described below depending on the particular operating system.

Note that the operating system and interface may be different from those described below depending on the product. For details, refer to the particular operation manual and website for each product.

Solved a problem in which DSD audio could not be played in some Yamaha audio devices. Changed the system requirements to the following.